Unit rationale, description and aim
This unit is the second of four in the Allied Health Honours program. Honours programs provide undergraduate students with the opportunity to learn how to conduct research, to develop more advanced professional knowledge and skills, and to enter higher degrees by research at Masters and PhD levels. Research skills are critical for the development of evidence based practice and policy that ensures quality care of individuals, families and communities requiring allied health and social services.
Research requires multiple steps with this unit focusing on designing a research project and writing a research proposal. This will include acquisition and application of knowledge about human ethics and/or governance approvals.
The overall aim of this unit is to develop student skills in research design, ethical considerations and project planning required for a successful project. In this unit students will acquire knowledge of research ethics and approval processes, and knowledge of how to apply research methods to a project. Students will design a research proposal that addresses the research questions from ALHT411 Honours Literature Review for Allied Health. Students will select, justify and apply research methods, consider ethical processes and apply for human ethics and/or governance approvals relevant for the project. They will work closely with their supervisor throughout the semester.
Learning outcomes
To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.
Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.
Explore the graduate capabilities.
Demonstrate sound knowledge of research designs, m...
Learning Outcome 01
Demonstrate appropriate interpretation and applica...
Learning Outcome 02
Effectively communicate the research proposal in w...
Learning Outcome 03
Content
Topics will include:
Application of research methods in health and social services, including
· Qualitative and quantitative methods
· Selection of research designs
· Sampling and recruitment
· External validity
· Measurement and data collection
· Research procedures, protocols and fidelity
· Data analysis and interpretation
Research ethics processes
· Guidelines for ethical conduct in human research
o NHMRC guidelines
o Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and communities
· Research ethics approval processes
Contemporary research topics such as
· Consumer perspectives in research
· Health economics
Data management and statistical analysis
· Quantitative analyses and interpretation
· Qualitative analyses and interpretation
· Systematic review processes
Assessment strategy and rationale
This unit adopts an authentic assessment approach by requiring students to demonstrate application of research design, methods and ethical principles to an individual research project. The assessment strategies for this unit comprise a written exam, an oral presentation, a written project proposal, and a hurdle task.
A written exam requires students to demonstrate sound understanding of research ethics with application to ethical and research method dilemmas. The oral presentation requires the student to clearly communicate the essential components of their project proposal and respond to clarifying questions. The questions and feedback assist the student to reflect and refine the project methodology prior to submitting the research proposal.
The written assessment requires students to demonstrate their ability to write a coherent research proposal which fully justifies the purpose, significance, design, methodology (including design, procedures, measures, analyses and ethical considerations) and timeline for a research project that will answer the research question identified in ALHT411 Honours Literature Review for Allied Health. This assessment is consistent with the ACU Guidelines for Honours Programs that stipulates that the final thesis submitted for an honours degree must include an expanded methodology (7.1, 11.1).
The hurdle task requires students to write an application for the approvals required for their project. This may be an ethics application submitted to an HREC, an application for registration of a systematic review protocol or a rationale for why an ethics application is not relevant for the project. The hurdle task will be submitted by the end of semester by all students. However, students will work with supervisors to determine the need for and the optimum timing for submission of required approval applications.
Overview of assessments
Written exam: Enables students to explore ethical...
Written exam: Enables students to explore ethical and research method dilemmas.
25%
Oral presentation of an e-poster: Enables student...
Oral presentation of an e-poster: Enables students to present their progress to date in developing individual project proposals and gain feedback.
25%
Written assignment: Enables students to write a s...
Written assignment: Enables students to write a structured project proposal for their individual research project.
50%
Written assignment: Enables students to consider ...
Written assignment: Enables students to consider required/relevant approvals and complete 1) an application form for ethics or 2) registration of a systematic review or 3) an alternative governance requirement or 4) justification of why an ethics or approval application is not required.
Ungraded Hurdle
Learning and teaching strategy and rationale
Students will be supported to develop advanced allied health research knowledge and skills and apply it to their individual research project with increasing autonomy. Lectures and online resources will provide students with the necessary knowledge and understanding of the ethical, legal and methodological requirements for research. Tutorials will provide students with the opportunity to discuss their understanding and application of ethical and methodological requirements for research. Students will be expected to take responsibility for their learning and meet regularly with their honours supervisors to develop their project proposal and any approvals or registrations required.
This unit involves 150 hours of learning with a combination of face-to-face, online and independent learning activities and assessment.
Representative texts and references
REPRESENTATIVE TEXTS AND REFERENCES
Barton, B., & Peat, J. (2014). Medical statistics: A guide to SPSS, data analysis and critical appraisal (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing
Liamputtong, P. (2013). Qualitative research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Liamputtong, P. (2017). Research methods in health: Foundations for evidence based practice (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
National Health and Medical Research Council (2018). Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra. Retrieved from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/resources/ethical-conduct-research-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples-and-communities
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2007). Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, The National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007), Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. Retrieved from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/r39
Portney, L., & Watkins, M. (2014). Foundations of clinical research (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall Inc.