Unit rationale, description and aim

Professional outcomes in government, policy development and advocacy require a workforce knowledgeable about contemporary global political developments with the capacity to evaluate policies pertaining to issues of social justice.

This unit explores the changing nature of international relations with respect to the issues of security, terrorism and human rights. Reviewing various conceptualizations of security, terrorism and foundational elements of human rights, this unit introduces students to the ramifications of security measures for human rights. Security concerns and measures differ between autocracies, mature democracies and countries in different stages of democratic reform. In this unit, student will use analytical tools to scrutinise controversial correlations between security and human rights in varying contexts, both at the national and international levels. Furthermore, by covering the engagement of the different actors, e.g., the UN, national states and non-state actors, and their partnerships and/or discords, the students will become familiar with the roles of different parties in protecting or violating human rights.

The aim of this unit is to identify the proposed contradictions between security and human rights and to investigate the appropriate mechanisms and strategies to address these contradictions.

2025 10

Campus offering

Find out more about study modes.

Unit offerings may be subject to minimum enrolment numbers.

Please select your preferred campus.

  • Term Mode
  • Semester 2Multi-mode
  • Term Mode
  • Semester 2Multi-mode
  • Term Mode
  • Semester 2Multi-mode

Prerequisites

Nil

Learning outcomes

To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.

Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.

Explore the graduate capabilities.

Describe the various conceptualisations of the not...

Learning Outcome 01

Describe the various conceptualisations of the notion of security and the origins, history and philosophical foundations of human rights
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC9, GC10, GC11

Critically examine the prioritisation of national ...

Learning Outcome 02

Critically examine the prioritisation of national security over international human rights standards
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC3, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC11

Apply the concepts, theories and methods used in s...

Learning Outcome 03

Apply the concepts, theories and methods used in security studies to an analysis of contemporary issue related to the potential conflict between human rights and national security
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC4, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Demonstrate the capacity to gather, analyse and ad...

Learning Outcome 04

Demonstrate the capacity to gather, analyse and advocate for ethical solutions to a global human rights and security crisis
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC2, GC3, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC11, GC12

Content

Topics will include:

  • Main themes and concepts of political violence, security, and human rights
  • Security and the state: historical relationship between violence and state making
  • State violence: torture, slavery, ethnic cleansing, and prisons
  • Terrorism: evolution, history, and ethics of terrorism
  • Human rights: foundations, developments, and perspectives
  • R2P: changing norms and empirical results of intervention

Assessment strategy and rationale

The assessment tasks for this unit are specifically designed to enable students to demonstrate their clear understanding of the complexities of correlations between security, terrorism and human rights in varying contexts. Students are required to provide a coherent, substantiated, structured and persuasive answer to the specific question asked in each assignment. Written assignments should demonstrate the capacity to integrate conceptual and theoretical knowledge with an understanding of evidentiary standards. Good argument must be supported by good evidence. This unit is assessed based on two written tasks that develop skills in reading, critical analysis and clear written communication. The first is in the form of an issue response and the second in the form of an overview essay. The third assessment is based in seminars and tutorials where students are required to prepare an oral presentation that will trigger further discussion and debate by fellow students and participate in the debate following other students’ presentations.

Overview of assessments

Assessment Task 1: Opinion Editorial  Requires st...

Assessment Task 1: Opinion Editorial 

Requires students to write an 800-word opinion editorial to develop a position on an ongoing issue related to terrorism, security and human rights. 

Weighting

30%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Assessment Task 2: Final Essay Requires students ...

Assessment Task 2: Final Essay

Requires students to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the subject matter, critical analysis of the relevant literature, and incorporate and synthesise relevant conceptual/theoretical ideas.  

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO2, LO3, LO4
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Assessment Task 3: Tutorial Presentation Tutorial...

Assessment Task 3: Tutorial Presentation

Tutorial presentation and participation in the debate following another presentation activity. 

Weighting

20%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO4
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC4, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC9, GC10, GC11, GC12

Learning and teaching strategy and rationale

This unit offers two formal ways of learning and teaching. Lectures will provide overviews of conceptual and theoretical material, while students’ reading will focus on contemporary and historical case-based learning. Students explore real world challenges and problems, a process that requires them to demonstrate their investigative, problem-solving and decision-making skills. Case-based learning requires learning specific theories and concepts that will complement the conceptual tools and theoretical knowledge critical to analysing divergent approaches to religion-politics relationships.

Tutorials for this unit provide opportunities for active learning. Students will engage in activities including reading, writing, interrogating ideas, exploring case studies and making presentations. These activities, as well as promoting analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of lecture content, are designed to build skills appropriate to second year study in Politics and International Relations. Furthermore, readings will deepen students’ knowledge of various cases and well as the relevant scholarly research. .

This is a 10-credit point unit and has been designed to ensure that the time needed to complete the required volume of learning to the requisite standard is approximately 150 hours in total across the semester. To achieve a passing standard in this unit, students will find it helpful to engage in the full range of learning activities and assessments utilised in this unit, as described in the learning and teaching strategy and the assessment strategy. The learning and teaching and assessment strategies include a range of approaches to support your learning such as reading, reflection, discussion, webinars, podcasts, video etc.

Representative texts and references

Representative texts and references

Graeber, D. and D. Wengorow, (2022), The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity, Penguin.

Greenberg, K. (ed.) (2008), The Torture Debate in America, Cambridge University Press.

Hoffman, B. (2017). Inside Terrorism 3rd ed., Columbia University Press

Malešević, S. (2017). The Rise of Organised Brutality: A Historical Sociology of Violence. Cambridge University Press.

North, D. C., J. J. Wallis and B. R. Weingast (2009). Violence and Social Orders: a Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge University Press.

Paper, R. (2006), Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism, Random House

Posner, E. (2014), The Twilight of Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press.

Richardson, L. (2006), What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy, Containing the Threat, Random House.

Ucko, D. (2022), The Insurgent’s Dilemma: A Struggle to Prevail, Oxford University Press.

Woodward, S. (2017), The Ideology of Failed States: Why Intervention Fails, Cambridge University Press.

Locations
Credit points
Year

Have a question?

We're available 9am–5pm AEDT,
Monday to Friday

If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, text us, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.

Live chat with us now

Chat to our team for real-time
answers to your questions.

Launch live chat

Visit our FAQs page

Find answers to some commonly
asked questions.

See our FAQs