Unit rationale, description and aim

Tertiary educators and (L&T) professionals (such as Academic Skills Advisers, Librarians, Placement supervisors etc) are responsible for supporting learning by creating intellectually stimulating, engaging, safe and responsive experiences, using all modes of delivery. They do this in a way that advances the goals of an institution in accordance with its policies and legislation. To do this effectively, educators and L&T professionals need to combine the knowledge of learning and teaching foundations and concepts with skills of critical reflection and reasoning and be able to draw on the scholarship of learning and teaching in higher education. Therefore, this microcredential aims to support students to reflect on their professional setting and practice as a teacher and L&T professional informed by reflective practice, and scholarly learning and teaching concepts. Other considerations include the needs and circumstances of learners, institutional mission and policies, and other governance requirements in the higher education sector.  

2025 5

Campus offering

Find out more about study modes.

Unit offerings may be subject to minimum enrolment numbers.

Please select your preferred campus.

  • Term Mode
  • Professional Term 2Online Unscheduled
  • Professional Term 4Online Unscheduled
  • Professional Term 5Online Unscheduled
  • Professional Term 8Online Unscheduled

Prerequisites

Nil

Incompatible

UNHE500 Learning and Teaching in Higher Education

Learning outcomes

To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.

Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.

Explore the graduate capabilities.

Use adult learning and teaching concepts and theor...

Learning Outcome 01

Use adult learning and teaching concepts and theories from educational literature to articulate your teaching philosophy
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC9, GC11

Apply scholarly learning and teaching concepts and...

Learning Outcome 02

Apply scholarly learning and teaching concepts and theories to teaching or to learning and teaching professional practice
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC9, GC11

Content

Topics include: 

  • Reflective practice of teachers and L&T professionals
  • the nature of adult learning 
  • theoretical and ethical perspectives on adult learning and teaching in higher education  
  • the diverse needs of adult learners  
  • principles of Catholic Social Thought 
  • working with university policies and procedures and strategic priorities for learning and teaching 
  • governance and regulatory requirements in the higher education sector 
  • applying the scholarship of learning and teaching  

Assessment strategy and rationale

The assessment strategy in this microcredential consists of one formative assessment task and one summative assessment task. The tasks provide a developmental sequence that supports the stated unit rationale and description and ensures the learning outcomes are assessed in a scaffolded learning sequence.  

The first assessment task is a formative assessment which supports student reflection on their teaching or upon their learning and teaching professional practice. It is essential preparation for the summative assessment. This task assesses learning outcome number 1. 

The second task is a summative assessment which comprises an activity that extends the reflection of the students’ practice undertaken in the first task, in a way that allows the student to apply their understanding of learning and teaching foundations and critiquing their practice. This task relates mostly to the achievement of learning outcome number 2, but builds on learning outcome 1, and assesses both.  

This microcredential is graded. In order to pass this microcredential, students are required to demonstrate a passing standard (or better) for the summative assessment task.

Overview of assessments

Assessment Task 1: Formative assessment &nbs...

Assessment Task 1: Formative assessment 

Students will reflect on their learning and teaching practice using a reflective practice model.

Weighting

For feedback

Learning Outcomes LO1
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC9, GC11

Assessment Task 2: Summative assessment &nbs...

Assessment Task 2: Summative assessment 

Students apply a scholarly reflection model and educational theories and concepts to their teaching or learning and teaching professional practice and context.

Weighting

100%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC2, GC3, GC7, GC9, GC11

Learning and teaching strategy and rationale

The intended audience for this microcredential is higher education academics and learning and teaching (L&T) professionals (such as Academic Skills Advisors, Librarians, Placement Supervisors etc.) whose geographical location is widespread, all of whom are qualified with at least one higher education degree. These academics and professionals have expertise that collectively spans the full range of disciplines taught by a university. This microcredential respects the range of experience in this cohort and responds in a manner that assists reflection on academic or L&T professional practice, informed by teaching foundations, the needs and circumstances of their students, institutional mission and policies, and other governance requirements in the higher education sector. 

This microcredential is delivered asynchonously, capitalising on the maturity and capability of the students, providing equitable access to a full provision of learning experiences within which a community of scholars can be developed. It is structured as a progressive, constructive, developmental sequence that supports learning in a scaffolded learning trajectory.

Representative texts and references

Representative texts and references

Biggs, J. B., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (5th ed.). London: McGraw-Hill Education.  

Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. John Wiley & Sons. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin, 3, 7.

Christie, M., & Asmar, C. (2021). Indigenous knowers and knowledge in university teaching. In University Teaching in Focus (pp. 260-284). Routledge.

Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking (Universities into the 21st century). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  

Fitzmaurice, M. (2010). Considering teaching in higher education as a practice, Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 45-55.

Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2009). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (3rd ed.). New York; London: Routledge. 

Hora, M & Smolarek, B. (2018). Examining Faculty Reflective Practice: A Call for Critical Awareness and Institutional Support, The Journal of Higher Education 89(4), pp. 533-581 https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1437663.

Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al. taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational psychology interactive22

 Hunt, L. & Chalmers, D. (Eds), 2021, University Teaching in Focus: A learning-centred approach. Lynne Hunt and Denise Chalmers (Eds.) 2nd edition, Routledge. pp260-284.

Knowles, M., Holton III, EF., & Swanson, R A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Oxfordshire, England: Routledge. 

Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A., Passarelli, A., & Sharma, G. (2014). On becoming an experiential educator: The educator role profile. Simulation and Gaming, 45(2), 204-234.  

Marshall, C. (1991). Teachers' learning styles: How they affect student learning. The Clearing House, 64(4), 225-227.

Massaro, T. (2021). Social welfare and Catholic social teaching: Foundational theological principles for case studies. Religions, 12(5), 288.

Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 

Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.  

Potter, M. K., & Kustra, E. (2012). A primer on learning outcomes and the SOLO taxonomy. Course Design for Constructive Alignment, 1-22. 

Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (2014). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67, 783-795. 

Proud, A. D., & Morgan, A. (2021). Critical self-reflection: A foundational skill. In Indigenous education in Australia (pp. 38-50). Routledge.

Race, P. (2014). Making learning happen: A guide for post-compulsory education (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. 

Richardson, J. T. (2015). Approaches to learning or levels of processing: what did Marton and Säljö (1976a) really say? the legacy of the work of the Göteborg Group in the 1970s. Interchange, 46, 239-269.

Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers' professional development. English language teaching, 3(4), 237-248.

Srinivasan, P. (2017) What we see is what we choose: seers and seekers with diversity, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25:2, 293-307, DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2016.1255243

Toni, N. and Makura, A.H. (2015). Using reflective practice for a more humane education, South African Journal of Higher Education, 29(3), 42-55.

Locations
Credit points
Year

Have a question?

We're available 9am–5pm AEDT,
Monday to Friday

If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, text us, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.

Live chat with us now

Chat to our team for real-time
answers to your questions.

Launch live chat

Visit our FAQs page

Find answers to some commonly
asked questions.

See our FAQs