Year
2021Credit points
10Campus offering
No unit offerings are currently available for this unit.Prerequisites
Nil
Teaching organisation
This fully online unit involves 150 hours of focused learning. The total includes formally structured learning activities within online LEO modules, and some synchronous webinar classes, if/as possible. The remaining hours typically involve reading, research, and the preparation of tasks for assessment. As a fully online unit, it has been designed principally as a blend of self-directed activity-based leaning and project-based learning.
Unit rationale, description and aim
Given its increasing reliance on advanced digital technologies and data accessibility, contemporary healthcare practice is faced with a range of complex ethical and legal challenges that need to be carefully understood and addressed. Ranging from issues concerning the ownership and secure use of patient data, to issues in research ethics, and the uses of artificial intelligence in therapeutic decision making, powerful new and emerging technologies raise many issues that require careful consideration. This unit names and explores such challenges with the aim of equipping students with the knowledge and skills to think, judge and respond appropriately on the basis of clear ethical principles, to current and emerging challenges in professional practice, thereby ensuring respect for human dignity whilst working for the common good. In so doing, it also provides insights into the larger social and commercial contexts within which clinical and healthcare management decisions are made.
Learning outcomes
To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.
Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.
Explore the graduate capabilities.
On successful completion of this unit, students should be able to:
LO1 - Describe key aspects of the social, clinical and management contexts that are affected by new and emerging developments in digital health, and explain the relevance of ethics to their application in practice (GA1; GA2);
LO2 - Critically analyse the benefits and associated ethical risk of new and emerging technologies and data applications in healthcare provision (GA1; GA2; GA4);
LO3 - Apply understanding of the benefits and risks of digital health developments, and the key ethical principles and challenges involved, to common clinical and/or management situations in healthcare (GA1; GA2; GA3; GA4; GA6)
Graduate attributes
GA1 - demonstrate respect for the dignity of each individual and for human diversity
GA2 - recognise their responsibility to the common good, the environment and society
GA3 - apply ethical perspectives in informed decision making
GA4 - think critically and reflectively
GA6 - solve problems in a variety of settings taking local and international perspectives into account
Content
Topics will include:
- Key concepts such as privacy, confidentiality, anonymity and deidentification, and general principles relating to the ethical and legal use of patient data;
- Measuring the value of health information, and the justification for the storage/use of data;
- Complexities concerning health data security issues (e.g., concerning opt ins and opt outs relating to databases);
- Ownership, use and confidentiality of genetic profiles;
- The ‘dual-use’ dilemma issue, particularly as it pertains to public health and the reuse of data acquired for other purposes;
- The use of individual and agglomerated data in healthcare research ethics;
- The use of pharmaceutical and substance abuse information;
- Issues raised by the use of artificial intelligence (e.g., machine learning and predictive modelling) in digital healthcare contexts, including the deferral of human judgement and the algorithmic design of ethical values into systems;
- Tensions between confidentiality and appropriate transparency relating to adoption records;
Learning and teaching strategy and rationale
This fully online unit involves 150 hours of focused learning. The total includes formally structured learning activities within online LEO modules, and some synchronous webinar classes, if/as possible. The remaining hours typically involve reading, research, and the preparation of tasks for assessment. As a fully online unit, it has been designed principally as a blend of self-directed activity-based leaning and project-based learning. However, there are also opportunities for collaborative and discussion-based learning via LEO forums which provide a constant opportunity for analysis and discussion of the material from each unit module. This provides participants with the opportunity to interact with one another, developing skills in dialogical debate and critical reflection. The project-based aspect relates to the research project on which participants work throughout the second half of the unit.
The unit’s LEO site provides rich resourcing via module texts, links to further academic and media sources, and embedded audio and video clips. An inquiry-based approach to learning will be prominent. Accordingly, students will be provided with some key theoretical frameworks that will be mapped onto important principles in applied healthcare contexts relating to digital health. Students will be challenged to further research and apply this material in order to deepen their grasp of key principles and appreciate more extensively ways in which ethical issues arise in this domain. This strategy will be facilitated by the use of case studies to assist students to appreciate some of the complex nuances around the focus and intent of the principles discussed, as well as the practical dilemmas that can arise in implementation.
Assessment strategy and rationale
This unit’s assessment strategy aims to facilitate and examine understanding of key concepts, principles and theories, and to then encourage and assess the application of this material to workplace facilitate participants’ application of incremental appropriation of unit content in relation to specific real-world workplace contexts. In this way, the assessment tasks enable participants to synthesize and deepen their learning, while also assessing their success in doing so.
The first assessment task requires participants to take their understanding of early unit material and to utilise this as they enter into dialogue with some of the scholarly literature in the field. The focus here is on understanding, analysis and reflection. The second task requires them to integrate and apply this learning to challenging real-world workplace realities. Both assessments provide a strong, practical connection between unit learning outcomes and participants’ professional roles.
Overview of assessments
Brief Description of Kind and Purpose of Assessment Tasks | Weighting | Learning Outcomes | Graduate Attributes |
---|---|---|---|
Critical reflection piece: Participants engage with two scholarly sources that take different ethical positions on an issue of importance in digital health. The purpose is to facilitate participant engagement with key concepts, principles and theories, and to open a dialogue with scholarly literature in this field.
| 50% | LO1, LO2 | GA1, GA 2, GA4 |
Integrative Case Study: Participants apply concepts, principles and theories developed in the unit to a specific real-world challenge relating to digital healthcare. The purpose of this piece is to apply unit learnings directly to workplace contexts. | 50% | LO2, LO3 | GA1, GA2, GA3, GA4, GA6 |
Representative texts and references
Arora, C. (2019). Digital health fiduciaries: Protecting user privacy when sharing health data.’ Ethics and Information Technology 21, 181-196
Baric-Parker, J., & Anderson, E. E. (2020) Patient data-sharing for AI: Ethical challenges, Catholic solutions. The Linacre Quarterly, (87)4, 471–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0024363920922690
Cohen, I. G., Gasser, U., Fernandez Lynch, H. & Vayena, E. (2018). Big data, health law, and bioethics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Harman, L. B. & Cornelius, F. (2015). Ethical Health Informatics: Challenges and Opportunities.3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning
Hasselberger, W. (2020). Ethics beyond computation: Why we can't (and shouldn't) replace human moral judgment with algorithms. Social Research: An International Quarterly, (86)4, 977-999
Celi, L. A., Ordóñez, P., Paik, K. E., Somai, M., Osorio, J., S. & Mujumder, M., S. (2020). Leveraging data science for global health. New York, NY: Springer.
Hoffman, S. (2016). Electronic health records and medical big data: Law and policy. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
Househ, M. (2019). Big data, big challenges: A healthcare perspective. Background, issues, solutions and research directions. Springer.
Jumelle A. K. L., & Ispas I. (2015) Ethical issues in digital health. In: S. Fricker, C. Thümmler, & A. Gavras (Eds) Requirements engineering for digital health. Springer.
Krutzinna, Jenny and Luciano Floridi, The Ethics of Medical Data Donation. Cham: Springer, 2019.
Panesar, Arjun, Machine Learning and AI for Healthcare: Big Data for Improved Health Outcomes. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2020.
Reddy, Sandeep, Artificial Intelligence: Applications in Healthcare Delivery. New York: Productivity Press, 2020.
Richterich, Annika, The Big Data Agenda: Data Ethics and Critical Data Studies. London: University of Westminster Press, 2018.
Rivas, H. & Wac, K. (2018). Digital health: Scaling healthcare to the world. Springer.
Sinibaldi, E. Gastmans, C., Yáñez, M., Lerner, R. M., Kovács, L., Casalone, C., Pegoraro, R. & Paglia, V. (2020). Contributions from the Catholic Church to ethical reflections in the digital era. Nature Machine Intelligence, (2), 242–244 doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0175-4
Steinbock, Bonnie et al (eds), Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine: Contemporary Readings in Bioethics. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012.