Unit rationale, description and aim

Debates about social justice, and the role that governments play in helping to create a thriving community are as intensely relevant now as they have ever been. In this unit, students investigate the question of what makes for a just society and good community. Students will be required to explore to explore philosophical accounts of justice, and various ways in which the just society is conceptualised. They examine how different schools of political thought – including liberal egalitarian, libertarian, communitarian, Marxist and republican – attend to the issues of liberty, equality, and community. Students are asked to analyse and critically assess the approach the schools of thought take in balancing these sometimes competing values. They are also asked to evaluate how the theories could be used to address social and political problems confronting society today.  

The unit’s aim is to assist students to engage in constructive moral dialogue about important social and political issues. It also provides a platform for the development and enhancement of critical thinking skills that are important across a range of occupations or professions. 

2025 10

Campus offering

No unit offerings are currently available for this unit

Prerequisites

Nil

Learning outcomes

To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.

Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.

Explore the graduate capabilities.

Identify and demonstrate comprehension of historic...

Learning Outcome 01

Identify and demonstrate comprehension of historically significant and influential accounts of justice and the good society

Critically analyse selected theories of justice an...

Learning Outcome 02

Critically analyse selected theories of justice and accounts of the good society, evaluating strengths and weaknesses.

Effectively present a coherent and well-reasoned p...

Learning Outcome 03

Effectively present a coherent and well-reasoned philosophical position.

Content

Topics will include:

  • Theories of what constitutes a just society, both historical and contemporary
  • Debates between perfectionism and liberalism
  • Debates between liberal egalitarian, libertarian, communitarian and Marxist approaches to justice.
  • Selected issues in applied and public ethics including such topics as distributive justice, foreign aid, and environmental responsibility.
  • Balancing and attending to the values of equality and liberty. 
  • Questions regarding the role of solidarity or community in society
  • Questions regarding the nature and role of public goods in society

Assessment strategy and rationale

The assessment strategy for this unit in philosophy is designed to facilitate developing understanding of important philosophical theories regarding a just and good society.

The early task is a relatively lightly weighted piece that assesses students’ understanding of essential terminology and theoretical material. The second task builds on this by assessing their ability to apply this basic knowledge to pertinent debates, as well as to begin to define their own positions on those debates. Both of these early tasks pave the way toward the final task, the research essay, in which they are required to select an important debate and to undertake further research in the field with a view to developing a critically-developed position of their own. 

Overview of assessments

Written analysis task Requires students to demon...

Written analysis task

Requires students to demonstrate understanding of key concepts and debates.

Weighting

20%

Learning Outcomes LO1

Written analysis task or presentation Requires s...

Written analysis task or presentation

Requires students to demonstrate understanding of key concepts and debates and to analyse important texts.

Weighting

30%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2

Argumentative/Research Essay Requires students to...

Argumentative/Research Essay

Requires students to critically analyse an important debate in the field and to develop a coherent and well-reasoned position of their own.

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3

Learning and teaching strategy and rationale

This unit is offered in synchronous national multi-mode and involves 150 hours of focused learning. The total includes formally structured learning activities such as lectures, tutorials, online learning, videoconferencing, or supervision. The remaining hours typically involve reading, research, and the preparation of tasks for assessment.

The unit has been designed as a blend of collaborative learning along with direct instruction to ensure that students develop an understanding of important philosophical concepts and theories. Students will be asked to engage in online discussions, provide written critiques of significant theories, and present their reasoned opinion on distinct philosophical positions. This structure ensures that students develop the ability to think critically and reflectively about the theories analysed.

These forms of instruction and engagement are designed to support students’ attainment of the learning outcomes. Direct instruction assists students in the identification and comprehension of important philosophical theories, while the written critiques and online discussions provide a venue for critical analysis and allow students to demonstrate an ability to develop a philosophically informed perspective of their own.  

Representative texts and references

Representative texts and references

Beitz, C. (1979). Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hurka, T. (1993). Perfectionism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Marx, K. (2000). “Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844” in Karl Marx Selected Writings. (ed). D. McLellan. New York: Oxford University Press

Mill, J. S. (2010). J. S. Mill: 'On Liberty' and Other Writings. New York: Classic Books.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Raz, J. (1986) The Morality of Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rousseau, J-J. (2003). On the Social Contract. (G.D.H. Cole, trans). New York: Dover.

Sandel, M. (1998, 2nd ed.). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Re-examined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wolff, J. and De-Shalit. (2007) Disadvantage. New York: Oxford University Press.

Locations
Credit points
Year

Have a question?

We're available 9am–5pm AEDT,
Monday to Friday

If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, text us, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.

Live chat with us now

Chat to our team for real-time
answers to your questions.

Launch live chat

Visit our FAQs page

Find answers to some commonly
asked questions.

See our FAQs