Unit rationale, description and aim

Speech pathologists are required to balance the juxtaposition of rapidly changing policy environments and technology with the unchanging values of the dignity of the human person and service to the common good. Adherence to core values and ethics amid significant industry change is essential for effective speech pathology practice across sectors and settings. In previous units, students have been introduced to core ethics, values, rights and principles fundamental to working with people with communication and swallowing needs, as well as clinical and professional skills. This unit builds upon this foundation by exploring the design and use of technology for professional activities (assessment, analysis, report writing and intervention) and in support of particular populations, especially users of  alternative and augmentative communication systems and those with lifelong disability. The unit has a strong focus on the integration of dignity, rights, values and ethics; interprofessional collaboration; and professional identity and advocacy. 

This unit aims to provide students with the opportunity to further develop their knowledge and skills in preparation for work within Australia’s disability support system as a speech pathologist and assess, recommend and implement high-tech multimodal communication options with individuals across the lifespan who have communication difficulties. 

2025 10

Campus offering

Find out more about study modes.

Unit offerings may be subject to minimum enrolment numbers.

Please select your preferred campus.

  • Term Mode
  • Semester 2Campus Attendance
  • Term Mode
  • Semester 2Campus Attendance
  • Term Mode
  • Semester 2Campus Attendance

Prerequisites

SPHY305 Speech Pathology Practice 3B AND (SPHY310 Community Development, Public Health and Speech Pathology OR ALHT420 Global Perspectives of Community-Centred Practice )

Learning outcomes

To successfully complete this unit you will be able to demonstrate you have achieved the learning outcomes (LO) detailed in the below table.

Each outcome is informed by a number of graduate capabilities (GC) to ensure your work in this, and every unit, is part of a larger goal of graduating from ACU with the attributes of insight, empathy, imagination and impact.

Explore the graduate capabilities.

Critique support services and funding for people w...

Learning Outcome 01

Critique support services and funding for people with a disability and complex communication needs and the role of the speech pathologist within multi- and interdisciplinary teams
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC11

Apply knowledge of high-tech augmentative and alte...

Learning Outcome 02

Apply knowledge of high-tech augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies for people with complex communication needs
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC6, GC10, GC12

Design technologically enhanced and evidence-based...

Learning Outcome 03

Design technologically enhanced and evidence-based service options for individuals with disability and complex communication needs across the lifespan
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC1, GC4, GC6, GC11

Critically reflect on emerging ethical issues in c...

Learning Outcome 04

Critically reflect on emerging ethical issues in contemporary speech pathology practice
Relevant Graduate Capabilities: GC6, GC7, GC8

Content

Topics will include:

Communication as a basic human right 

Ethical principles, including advocacy and autonomy, central to working in disability and with users of multimodal communication 

Integration of multimodal communication into the community 

Social and psychological impact of utilizing multimodal systems – listening to the individual and their supports 

Principles and best practice in assessment and intervention for Alternative and Augmentative Communication (AAC)

Identifying and understanding the needs and wants of the individual regarding multimodal communication 

Assessing capacity and suitability of options (cognitive, language, speech, physical and personal considerations) 

Developing person-centred and functional goals relating to communication and participation 

Contemporary conceptions and definitions of disability 

Multimodal communication needs of specific populations 

Congenital, developmental, progressive, and acquired communication disorders that may result in an individual utilizing multimodal communication options

Considerations of short-term versus long-term use of multimodal communication. 

Special considerations for AAC for: 

  • Developmental disorders e.g. autism spectrum disorders, cerebral palsy, intellectual disability, social communication disorders 
  • Acquired disorders e.g. stroke, cognitive communication disorders 
  • Progressive disorders e.g. Motor Neuron Disease, Palliative Care 


Cultural and linguistic considerations in multimodal communication decision making 

The disability support services landscape in Australia and intersection with other service sectors 

Working within an inter-professional team to support the individual requiring/using a multimodal system


High-Tech communication: 

  • Text based devices; 
  • Semantic Compaction Devices; 
  • Mobile technologies (e.g. iPad) 
  • Identification and use of appropriate outcome measures 
  • Special considerations for assessment, implementation and outcome measurement. 

Assessment strategy and rationale

As a capstone unit in the Bachelor of Speech Pathology Program, this unit requires students to demonstrate high level reasoning consistent with readiness to enter the profession. Students are required to show the ability to synthesise and evaluate complex information and ethical corollaries.  

Assessment task 1: Students will be required to work in small groups to critique and redevelop a service plan for families of children or adults with a disability and complex communication needs.  

Assessment 2: Students are to work individually to prepare and present a poster describing a high-tech AAC device. The presentation will include a description of the intended consumer (using the ICF framework) based on an assessment of the Primary, Secondary and Tertiary components of the AAC system. 

Assessment 3: This assessment requires students to prepare and participate in a debate relating to either emerging technologies, service delivery issues or the disability landscape as related to speech pathology practice.

Overview of assessments

Assessment Task 1: (Service plan evaluation) ...

Assessment Task 1: (Service plan evaluation)  

Enables students to demonstrate knowledge and skill in disability care and high-level ethical reasoning.  

Weighting

20%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO4
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC11
Standards PSSP 1.1, PSSP 1.2, PSSP 1.3, PSSP 1.4, PSSP 1.6, PSSP 2.1, PSSP 2.2, PSSP 2.6, PSSP 3.1

Assessment Task 2 (Technology seminar)  Ena...

Assessment Task 2 (Technology seminar)

 Enables students to investigate and assess high-tech AAC. 

Weighting

30%

Learning Outcomes LO2, LO3
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC6, GC10, GC12
Standards PSSP 1.1, PSSP 1.3, PSSP 1.4, PSSP 1.6, PSSP 2.5, PSSP 3.1

Assessment Task 3 (Debate) Enables students to e...

Assessment Task 3 (Debate)

Enables students to explore complex ethical issues in disability, technology and speech pathology

Weighting

50%

Learning Outcomes LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4
Graduate Capabilities GC1, GC6, GC7, GC8, GC11
Standards PSSP 1.1, PSSP 1.2, PSSP 1.3, PSSP 1.4, PSSP 1.6, PSSP 2.1, PSSP 2.2, PSSP 2.6, PSSP 3.1

In order to pass this unit students must demonstrate achievement of every learning outcome and obtain a minimum mark of 50% for the unit. 

Learning and teaching strategy and rationale

This unit has a flexible learning approach to accommodate the varied placement schedules of fourth year students. Key information and resources will be provided online to enable students to engage with the materials asynchronously and while attending professional practice experiences away from campus. 

 Additionally, students will participate in workshops which will develop their skills in the use of assistive technology and working in teams. These activities will prepare students to complete industry relevant assessment tasks. Students should expect to complete 150 hours of learning in this unit. 

Professional Standards for Speech Pathologists in Australia

In connection to the learning outcomes, the Professional Standards for Speech Pathologists in Australia (Professional Standards) detail

  • the knowledge, skills and attributes a speech pathologist practising in Australia must demonstrate and apply, at any point in their career, as relevant to their speech pathology role and work context
  • the knowledge, skills and attributes a graduating speech pathology student must demonstrate and be able to apply by the time they complete their entry-level degree.

The Professional Standards should not be read in isolation. Speech pathologists should also be cognisant of, and comply with, relevant legislation, Speech Pathology Australia policies and the Speech Pathology Australia Code of Ethics.

  • Relating to

    Provide ethical and evidence-based practice

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO3, LO4

  • Relating to

    Comply with legislation, standards, policies and protocols

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO1, LO3, LO4

  • Relating to

    Provide safe and quality services 

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO1, LO2, LO3, LO4

  • Relating to

    Collaborate with individuals, their supports, our colleagues and the community

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO1, LO2, LO3

  • Relating to

    Maintain high standards of communication, information sharing and record keeping

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

  • Relating to

    Consider the needs of individuals and communities in clinical decision-making and practice

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO3, LO4

  • Relating to

    Advocate for optimal communication and swallowing

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

  • Relating to

    Demonstrate self-awareness

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO4

  • Relating to

    Use critical reflection to guide professional development and practice

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO4

  • Relating to

    Acquire, critique and integrate knowledge from a range of sources

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO2, LO3

  • Relating to

    Engage in learning with colleagues, students and the community

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO1, LO3

  • Relating to

    Develop shared understanding of speech pathology

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO1, LO2, LO3

  • Relating to

    Assess communication and swallowing needs

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

  • Relating to

    Interpret, diagnose and report on assessments 

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

  • Relating to

    Plan speech pathology intervention or service response 

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

  • Relating to

    Implement and evaluate intervention or service response

    Relevant Learning OutcomeLO3

Representative texts and references

Representative texts and references

Body, R. & McAllister, L. (2009). Ethics in speech and language therapy. Wiley. 

 

Beukelman, D. R. & Light, J. C. (2020). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Paul H Brookes. 

 

Bloomberg, K., West, D., & Johnson, H. (2004). InterAACtion- Strategies for intentional and unintentional communicators. Communication Resource Centre, Scope.  

  

Lancioni, G.E., & Singh, N.N. (Eds). (2014). Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities. Springer  

  

Light, J.C., Beukelman, D.R., & Reichle, J. (2003). Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice. Paul. H. Brookes.  

  

Madden, B., McIlwraith, J., & Brell, R. (2013). The national disability insurance scheme handbook. Reed International Books.  

  

McVilly, K, R. (2002). Positive Behaviour Support for people with intellectual disability: Evidence-based practice, promoting quality of life. The Australian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability Inc.  

  

Odom, S.L., Horner, R.H., Snell, M.E., & Blacher, J. (Eds). (2007). Handbook of developmental disabilities. The Guildford Press.  

  

Reichle, J., Beukelman, D.R., & Light, J.C. (Eds). (2002). Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC. Paul. H. Brookes.  

  

Schlosser, R. (2003). The efficacy of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Toward evidence –based practice. Elsevier Science. 

Locations
Credit points
Year

Have a question?

We're available 9am–5pm AEDT,
Monday to Friday

If you’ve got a question, our AskACU team has you covered. You can search FAQs, text us, email, live chat, call – whatever works for you.

Live chat with us now

Chat to our team for real-time
answers to your questions.

Launch live chat

Visit our FAQs page

Find answers to some commonly
asked questions.

See our FAQs